Corrections and Glosses in Textus Roffensis: The Kentish Laws and the Laws of Alfred and Ine
National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
For citation: Zemlyakov, Mikhail V. Corrections and glosses in Textus Roffensis: The Kentish laws and the laws of Alfred and Ine // Graphosphaera. 2021. Vol. 1. P. 41–56. URL: http://writing.igh.ru/index.php?id=corrections-and-glosses
DOI: 10.32608/2782-5272-2022-1-41-56
Abstract: The paper is dedicated to Textus Roffensis, the manuscript copied c. 1122 x 1124 and containing one of the most important collections of Anglo-Saxon laws. The author studies corrections, emendations, glosses, and other signs in the main text and in the margins of the two earliest legal texts included into Textus Roffensis: the laws of 7th-century Kentish kings Æthelberht, Hlothhere and Eadric, and Wihtred, and the law-code of Alfred of Wessex (the late 9th century) which, in turn, had incorporated the laws of Ine (the late 7th century). The analysis of those corrections and glosses as well as the comparison with the text of the laws of Alfred and Ine in Cambridge, Corpus Christi College, 383 leads the author to a conclusion that the editorial work of the scribe was mainly of two kinds: the scribe either copied archaic word-forms and then emended them to more up-to-date ones, or re-read the laws in order to find mistakes or lapses. Due to this, the concentration of corrections differs much in different pages of Textus Roffensis. The most significant difference is between the Kentish laws and the laws of Alfred and Ine. The latter contain much more corrections and glosses than the former, and that may reflect their perception as somewhat actual for the legitimization of the Anlgo-Saxon clergy in early 12th-century England.
Key words: Anglo-Saxons, Kent, Wessex, Textus Roffensis, Æthelberht, Alfred the Great, laws, Norman Conquest, palaeography, codicology, Old English language
Литература / References
Земляков М. В. Категории зависимости в древнеанглийских правовых источниках VII – начала X в. (анализ Textus Roffensis) // Восточная Европа в древности и средневековье. [Вып. XXV:] Экономические основы формирования государства в древности и средневековье. М., 2013. С. 108–113. [Zemlyakov M. V. Kategorii zavisimosti v drevneangliyskikh pravovykh istochnikakh VII – nachala X v. (analiz Textus Roffensis) (The Categories of Dependence in Old English Legal Sources of the 7th – Early 10th Centuries (the Analysis of Textus Roffensis)) // Vostochnaya Yevropa v drevnosti i srednevekov'ye. [Vyp. XXV:] Ekonomicheskiye osnovy formirovaniya gosudarstva v drevnosti i srednevekov'ye. Moscow, 2013. S. 108–113.]
Земляков М. В. Законы кентских королей VII в. в Рочестерском кодексе (Textus Roffensis): Обстоятельства появления и структура // Источниковедческие исследования. М., 2014. Вып. 6. С. 9–31. [Zemlyakov M. V. Zakony kentskikh koroley VII v. v Rochesterskom kodekse (Textus Roffensis): Obstoyatel'stva poyavleniya i struktura (The laws of the 7th-century kings of Kent in Textus Roffensis: The origin and structure) // Istochnikovedcheskiye issledovaniya. Moscow, 2014. Vyp. 6. S. 9–31.] (a)
Земляков М. В. Становление законодательства в раннесредневековой Англии: законы кентских королей VII в. // Средние века. 2014. Вып. 75 (1–2). С. 262–272. [Zemlyakov M. V. Stanovleniye zakonodatel'stva v rannesrednevekovoy Anglii: zakony kentskikh koroley VII v. (The Making of Legislation in Early Medieval England: the Laws of Kentish Kings of the 7th Century) // Srednie veka. 2014. Vyp. 75 (1–2). S. 262–272.] (b)
Die Gesetze der Angelsachsen / Hrsg. F. Liebermann. Halle a/Saale, 1916. Bd. 3: Einleitung zu jedem Stück; Erklärungen zu einzelnen Stellen.
Gendre R. Le leggi di Aethelberht: “iuxta exempla Romanorum” e “iuxta consuetudines Germanorum” // Testi giuridici germanici. Atti del XVII Convegno dell'Associazione Italiana di Filologia Germanica, Potenza, 24-25 maggio 1990 / A cura di L. Lazzari. Potenza, 1992. P. 7–21.
Gobbit T. The Other Book: Cambridge, Corpus Christi College, Ms. 383 in Relation to the Textus Roffensis // Textus Roffensis. Law, Language, and Libraries in Early Medieval England / Ed. by B. O’Brien and B. Bombi. Turnhout, 2015. P. 69–82.
Hough C. The Early Kentish “Divorce Laws”: a Reconsideration of Æthelberht, Chapters 79 and 80 // Anglo-Saxon England. 1994. Vol. 23. P. 19–34.
Hough C. Two Kentish Laws concerning Women: A New Reading of Æthelberht 73 and 74 // Anglia: Journal of English Philology. 2001. Vol. 119. Iss. 4. P. 554–578.
Hough C. Women and the Law in Seventh-Century England // Nottingham Mediaeval Studies. 2007. Vol. 51. P. 207–230.
Hough C. “An Ald Reht”: Essays on Anglo-Saxon Law. Newcasle-upon-Tyne, 2014.
Hough C. The Earliest English Texts? The Language of the Kentish Laws Reconsidered // Textus Roffensis. Law, Language, and Libraries in Early Medieval England / Ed. by B. O’Brien and B. Bombi. Turnhout, 2015. P. 137–156.
Jurasinski S. The Continental Origins of Æthelberht’s Code // Philological Quarterly. 2001. Vol. 80. P. 1–15.
Jurasinski S. Germanism, Slapping and the Cultural Contexts of Æthelberht’s Code: A Reconsideration of Chapters 56–58 // Haskins Society Journal. 2006. Vol. 18. P. 51–71.
Jurasinski S. Sanctuary, House-Peace, and the Traditionalism of Alfred’s Laws // The Journal of Legal History. 2010. Vol. 31. P. 129–147.
Jurasinski S., Oliver L. The Laws of Alfred. The Domboc and the Making of Anglo-Saxon Law. Cambridge, 2021.
Jurasinski S. Scribal Malpractice and the Study of Anglo-Saxon Law in the Twelfth Century // Textus Roffensis. Law, Language, and Libraries in Early Medieval England / Ed. by B. O’Brien and B. Bombi. Turnhout, 2015. P. 83–101.
Karn N. Textus Roffensis and its Uses // Textus Roffensis. Law, Language, and Libraries in Early Medieval England / Ed. by B. O’Brien and B. Bombi. Turnhout, 2015. P. 49–68.
Oliver L. Æthelberht's fedesl Revisited // Notes and Queries. 2008. Vol. 55. P. 125–126.
Oliver L. The Beginning of English Law. Toronto; London, 2002.
Oliver L. The Body Legal in Barbarian Law. Toronto [et al.], 2011.
Parker Library on the Web. [электронный ресурс] URL: https://parker.stanford.edu/parker/catalog/mv340ty8592 (17.07.2021).
The Production and Use of English Manuscripts 1060 to 1220. [электронный ресурс] URL: https://www.le.ac.uk/english/em1060to1220/mss/EM.RCL.htm (06.07.2021).
Rabin A. Gang Violence in the Laws of Alfred the Great: The Problem of Hloð-Sliht // Notes and Queries. 2016. Vol. 63. № 4. P. 516–521.
Richards M. P. Texts and Their Traditions in the Medieval Library of Rochester Cathedral Priory. Philadelphia, 1988.
Richards M. P. Elements of a Written Standard in the Old English Law // Standardizing English: Essays in the History of Language Changing in honour of J. H. Fisher. Knoxville, 1989. P. 1–22.
Rubin S. Æthelberht 36. A Medico-Linguistical Discussion on the Word Hion // Nottingham Mediaeval Studies. 1995. Vol. 39. P. 19–25.
Textus Roffensis. Rochester Cathedral Library, ms. A. 3. 5 / Ed. by P. H. Sawyer. Vol. 1. Copenhagen, 1962.
The University of Manchester Library (LUNA). [электронный ресурс] URL: https://luna.manchester.ac.uk/luna/servlet/detail/Man4MedievalVC~4~4~990378~142729 (дата обращения 15.07.2021).
Wormald P. The Making of English Law: King Alfred to the Twelfth Century. Vol. 1. Oxford, 1999. Vol. 2. London, 2014. (a)
Wormald P. In Search of King’s Offa “Law-Code” // Wormald P. Legal Culture in the Early Medieval West: Law as Text, Image and Experience. London; Rio Grande, 1999. P. 201–223. (b)
